Wednesday, February 15, 2012

If Global Warming were true, would we expect to see more record snowfalls as the ice melts?

http://www.currentresults.com/Weather-Ex鈥?/a>



I'm no scientist, so I ask. If this were true, that ice was melting at an 'alarming' rate, wouldn't we expect to see more snowfall?



http://www.currentresults.com/Weather-Ex鈥?/a>





Alabama 22.6 Florence 1968

Alaska 974.1 Thompson Pass 1953

Arizona 344.0 Sunrise Mountain 1975

Arkansas 36.8 Yellville 2 SSE 1970

California 746.5 Echo Summit Sierra at Tahoe 1983

Colorado 520.0 Wolf Creek Pass 4 W 1948

Connecticut 152.5 Norfolk 2 SW 1967

Delaware 49.1 Georgetown 5 SW 1996

Florida 4.0 Milton Experimental Station 1954

Georgia 21.9 Blairsville Experimental Station 1936

Idaho 380.1 Roland West Portal 1946

Illinois 103.3 Antioch 1979

Indiana 125.6 La Porte 1978

Iowa 85.6 Cresco 1 NE 1951

Kansas 103.6 McDonald 1984

Kentucky 108.2 Benham 1960

Louisiana 16.0 Farmerville 1899

Maine 237.6 Long Falls Dam 1969

Maryland 169.5 McHenry 2 NW 1993

Massachusetts 156.1 Ashfield 1996

Michigan 263.5 Copper Harbor 3 WNW 1982

Minnesota 154.0 Pigeon River Bridge 1934

Mississippi 83.5 Station Number 222023 1963

Missouri 73.9 Edina 1978

Montana 368.9 Summit 1943

Nebraska 100.6 Mullen 21 NW 1995

Nevada 178.5 Glenbrook 1949

New Hampshire 331.1 Mount Washington 2006

New Jersey 104.5 Canistear Reservoir 1961

New Mexico 281.0 Anchor Mine 1919

New York 379.5 Hooker 12 NNW 1979

North Carolina 103.4 Boone 1960

North Dakota 103.0 Steele 1970

Ohio 147.5 Chardon 1963

Oklahoma 56.9 Hooker 1993

Oregon 822.0 Crater Lake National Park 1949

Pennsylvania 186.1 Ebensburg Sewage Plant 1978

Rhode Island 129.1 North Foster 1 E 1996

South Carolina 27.3 Catawba 1936

South Dakota 324.0 Lead 1997

Tennessee 75.5 Mountain City 2 1960

Texas 58.7 Borger 1983

Utah 810.5 Alta 1984

Vermont 236.8 Mount Mansfield 1968

Virginia 124.2 Wise 3 E 1996

Washington 621.1 Stevens Pass 1965

West Virginia 241.3 Davis 3 SE 2003

Wisconsin 161.5 Lac Vieux Desert 1971

Wyoming 382.4 Snake River 1976



Only two instances of record snowfall after 2000. Weather patterns here have remained pretty much the same with slight shifts in either direction all my life.If Global Warming were true, would we expect to see more record snowfalls as the ice melts?
What you will see is longer summers and shorter winters characterized by more abrupt and deeper southward dips in the jet stream along the temperate latitudes in some places and more northern amplitudes in others. Generally speaking cold fronts and low pressure areas are associated with these gyrations of the jet stream. Warmer south to north air flows over warmer ocean water is associated with an evermore saturated air masses. When dense cold air behind a cold front gets overrun by a massively saturated warm air mass the result is a wet snowfall or rainstorm. Depending on how fast the front is moving will determine how long the snow or rain will fall. A slow moving or stationary front, given a long lasting northerly flow of warm moist air will drop massive amounts of snow or rain....sometimes known as a 'perfect storm'. Melting ice, as it thermally expands will of course take up more room in the ocean basins making X more square miles of ocean to evaporate moisture into the atmosphere. So far, so good! What we do know is that the ice IS melting, and the temperature of the oceans are warmer. While the the rise isn't spectacular in itself it still amounts to air masses that can hold X amount more moisture so the thesis that heavier snowfalls can be expected is simply good physics. Of course the jet stream does gyrate up and down as it progresses in a west to east direction. Should the eastern United States see the jet stream loop way north they'll see almost no snow in some seasons while western Europe will experience a really cold, though shorter winter. Of course that's the Cliff Notes version of how these things work, but the takeaway is that even a few degrees rise in world temperatures WILL extend or shorten established climate patterns. A shorter or more massive monsoon season in India would mean goodbye India as far as it's established agriculture is concerned...big bummer for them. Should we worry? I'd say so!
Libs are so easily fooled, if GW was real there would be no reason for the CRU wouldn't have to make up data and intimidate other scientists into going along.If Global Warming were true, would we expect to see more record snowfalls as the ice melts?
"Climate Change" get with the programe!
It's not true and any statistic will be used by liberals to prove their theory.If Global Warming were true, would we expect to see more record snowfalls as the ice melts?
Yes. Global warming causes weather to do crazy things. The earth is sick and needs to be healed.
Global warming is bunk.



Anyone who believes otherwise, needs to be de-programmed.
a byproduct of global warming is extra moisture caught in the atmosphere..leading to more precipitation
Sadly the only thing rising is greeners pocket books. Energy and gas is on the rise
yes
Global Warming is true. While some please get colder, other places are warming wich is why the ice caps are melting.

Look at the overall world temperture, not just some places.
Republicans ignored the warning signs before 9/11 and they ignore Global Warming.

Bush Quote
"Oh no my young Jedi, you will find that it is you mistaken about a great many things."

Democratic Quote
"Your overconfidence is your weakness."
The term "Global Warming" has been revised to "Climate Change" so it can be blamed for any weather condition.

Congress to Subpoena Climate Scientists
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/inters鈥?/a>

2006 Climate Report Plagiarized
http://www.usatoday.com/weather/climate/鈥?/a>

IPCC Official Admits Redistribution of Wealth
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh鈥?/a>

Global Climate Disruption?
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesd鈥?/a>

Climate-Gate Scandal Hid Data
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/01/2鈥?/a>

Himalayan Hoax
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/200鈥?/a>

UN climate chief admits mistake
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/en鈥?/a>

Global Not Warming
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/natur鈥?/a>

No global warming since 1995
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-鈥?/a>

Top UN climate official resigning
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100218鈥?/a>
"I'm no scientist"

Yet you think your conclusions have any validity at all. Why is that?

***

"It's not true"

You don't know that, so why do you state it as a fact? I don't know that's it's true, and you don't know that it's not.

***

"Yes".

Everyone's an expert in here? Climatologists all? The arrogance is amazing.
Ok, I'm confused.

I thought the line these days was "It's real but humans have no effect on it."

Conservatives need to make up their mind.

Either it's a natural process,

or record cold disproves it.

Can't be both.
Earth has been around so long we don't even know what is record or not record.



For sure in the past 100 years that hasn't been that much change at all- its just WEATHER PATTERNS-

Global Warming is just a Political Stunt for World Profits and World Control. The New World Order dreamers made up Global Warming to get more support from people who seek robotic behavior for their life.

No comments:

Post a Comment